Reposting since a bunch of people didn't see the thread from this weekend: the plan for channels.

One way to think of Warpcast is like a testnet for Farcaster protocol mainnet. It won't always be the case, but while the protocol is still small and we're looking for the growth driver (the existential problem to solve for the protocol), Warpcast is planning to rapidly experiment off-protocol

20. hacking @ https://www.spire.dev/ 
previously intern Nethermind, epns.io

the irony of not posting this in a channel

building products onchain, hacking /farhack, yapping /dylan | dylansteck.com

It may still be FIP-2 compatible but no promises. Want to optimize for the winning configuration long-term.

We're also still not sure channels are *the thing*

Assuming this means no more FIP-2 as currently constructed once things are ironed out and channels move to the protocol?

They're (X) not on chain, they're no match for the inherent user trust & security of Warpcast. Just getting a little philosophical on the existential importance of this project to create trust online.