Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dylan Abruscato pfp
Dylan Abruscato
@dylanabruscato
Posted this on Twitter, but I think there are pretty big misaligned incentives in funding rounds like this. These encourage folks to add as many random onchain transactions as possible, but the opposite will truly onboard the masses.
3 replies
2 recasts
11 reactions

Dylan Abruscato pfp
Dylan Abruscato
@dylanabruscato
Maybe I'm just surprised that CTG wasn't one of the 200+ projects chosen (we deployed on Base and submitted) Technically, our challenges like crypto puzzles/scavenger hunts weren't onchain, and our only transactions were for the entry NFTs, but so many in the space told me CTG had outsized impact.
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

vijay pfp
vijay
@vijay
totally agree. it’s the ultimate problem of trying to award “fairly” and programmatically - we measure what’s easy to measure, and then what gets measured gets optimised. account abstracted transactions also got underrepresented here… the only path forward is to lobby OP delegates to change the weighting rn
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
yup, supercast also wouldn’t qualify defi projects with washed volume, token incentives and venture funding of course did
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction