Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Does anyone know why Apple needs to work with Broadcom here (given their in-house capabilities)?
5 replies
5 recasts
44 reactions

July pfp
July
@july
My guess is that earlier last year Broadcom and Apple had an agreement to develop RF chips for 5G, and that it is expands on their agreement. I think Baltra is still TSMC under the hood, so hedge their bets to do in house (since they have more expertise on the software side - they don't need / want NVIDIA, also NVIDIA is expensive) to work with suppliers like Broadcom. Makes sense, seems like the path they took towards A chips and M-chips, prob trying to do the same for server stuff.
2 replies
0 recast
20 reactions

carrrrrlos pfp
carrrrrlos
@carrrrrlos.eth
Apple protocol to hire before aquihire
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ruz.eth ๐Ÿ„ pfp
ruz.eth ๐Ÿ„
@ruz.eth
Most likely patents
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Smash Thunder Stone ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿน๐Ÿงพ pfp
Smash Thunder Stone ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿน๐Ÿงพ
@smashthunderston
The specifics, no. Seems like a good call though.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

SchmRdty.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
SchmRdty.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@schmidtiest.eth
I do not claim to "know" but I would say at the very least that in house capabilities can become an echo chamber. Though it could be that Broadcom has a solid history with silicon and Apple has strong competition. idk
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction