Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1/ How will Farcaster succeed if apps have to compete with Warpcast? If there are enough daily active users of the protocol and the underlying data and APIs are actually permissionless, people will build new and interesting apps. This has been the plan since the beginning (channels being a new thing along the way).
4 replies
35 recasts
260 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
2/ We call it product-led protocol development. If you’re not willing to the hardest thing (retained user acquisition) yourself, why would anyone else do it on your behalf? The hard part about social networks isn’t the technology, it’s getting people to use it (and keep using it).
5 replies
1 recast
61 reactions
Garrett 🎩↑ᖽ
@garrett
How do you think about incentives in this context? Curios to hear your thoughts on incentive design as it relates to user acquisition and retention
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Make it easy to onboard users to my app is a damn good incentive
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Garrett 🎩↑ᖽ
@garrett
Easy onboarding is a great feature but nobody is trying an app simply bc it’s easy to onboard incentives need the answer the “Why farcaster?” question
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
correct, why warpcast is focused on onboarding users. makes it easier for all the other apps to just provide an interesting new thing
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett 🎩↑ᖽ
@garrett
So you’re saying that everything built on top of farcaster by others should answer the why question? Makes sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
