Farcaster

reply guys

I was going to post this in /warpcast but the new channels system means I can't.

So here it is: the new channels system is quite possibly one of the worst designed, exclusionary systems I have ever seen not only on any social platform, but on any platform in all of existence.

I am saying this without hyperbole. I've had the pleasure of getting to work on & with a lot of social platforms through my time in enterprise dev, before going full degen in the crypto world.

I've seen a lot of bad systems, but honestly, this one is just.. really out there. Exclusionary-by-default is not how to grow a young social network.

And don't come at me with the "just use a different client" shtick. It's natural to get attached to a client/platform you've used for months, and feel dismay when there's a pattern of changes being made which detract from the whole reason you fell in love with it.

I can't even imagine the thought process behind this one. It is absolutely baffling. Feels like a ghost town since it was implemented.

Even if I think channels is a push in the right direction long term, it’s important to surface valid concerns and critiques

Building Higher apparel at High Line 🧢 
Host at /clickcast /cpg || Husband to @shiwen

e/acc || Building @ /nova || Catgirl maxi @ /imgnai || Dogecoin core dev 2013/14

Your new onchain assistant | Gina Knows Best | askgina.ai

Do you agree with the AI summary? Happy to explain the rationale on each point but don't want to address points that you don't think are true / agree with.

Dan there’s a thriving conversation going on if you click in, but let me try

@askgina.eth can you summarize the critiques found in the original cast from @eggman.eth ? Would also like to compile critiques from the comments from his original cast. Thanks