Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How to implement a version of the power badge for your client 1. Pick 100 good users. Your choice / definition of what is good is up to you. 2. Who do those 100 people engage with the most. Maybe take 400 top most engaged with. 3. Take those 500 people and see who they engage with. Cut off at 1000-2000 total. Since it's your client, you get to make the rules.
23 replies
3 recasts
72 reactions

Nirry pfp
Nirry
@nirry.eth
give back power badge or iโ€™m calling the crypto police
6 replies
0 recast
15 reactions

ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
Alternatively implement eigentrust which is basically a more general form of what you've just described. You can even use the users currently followed accounts as the seed nodes which makes it even more personalized.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Diji ๐Ÿฆ‰๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ”ต  pfp
Diji ๐Ÿฆ‰๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ”ต
@dijaraj
๐Ÿ™Œ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

meta-david๐ŸŽฉ | Building Scoop3 pfp
meta-david๐ŸŽฉ | Building Scoop3
@metadavid
If anyone needs a bad user, Iโ€™m your guy. ๐Ÿ‘
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
The problem with this is not the start, but the iterations. Itโ€™s not scalable, with simple, transparent rules. You get a group that tends to be constant - or you force everyone to spam engage with this group. Not something someone can achieve on their own - no matter how good their content is.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Sujit ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ  ๐ŸŽฉ  pfp
Sujit ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐ŸŽฉ
@0xsujit
So the powerbadge algorithm got revealed ๐ŸŒš
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

nkemjika.eth pfp
nkemjika.eth
@nkemjika
To what aim? I think the playing field is more welcoming without the badge currently. No one cares if you own a badge, they just interact.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

FCP pfp
FCP
@fuckcoolpussy.eth
without power badge I dont think this is real @dwr.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dd8๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽญ pfp
dd8๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽญ
@dd8
I think it's a decent system if we can trust the first 100 people who matter most.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Luffy pfp
Luffy
@hinhuk
Finally we know the power badge algorithm, which means it will be get rid of forever
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Durgaboro pfp
Durgaboro
@durgaboro
Woho
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dharmi Kumbhani pfp
Dharmi Kumbhani
@dharmi
For step 2 and 3: You can use these endpoints available on OpenRank to quickly identify the most engaged users for any given fid or a group of fids. + you can specify the number of hops to determine how far into the extended network you wish to search. https://docs.openrank.com/integrations/farcaster/personalized-network/extended-network/personalized-engagement
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

patxol ๐Ÿ”ท anser.social  pfp
patxol ๐Ÿ”ท anser.social
@patxol.eth
It is so simple and yet so effective! Thanks Dan, itโ€™s giving me some new feature ideas ๐Ÿ’ก
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dani pfp
Dani
@smokingfrog.eth
dan ๐Ÿค dani
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

baubergo pfp
baubergo
@baubergo-
TL;DR ---> @moxie.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Glitch Witch ๐Ÿ”ฒ pfp
Glitch Witch ๐Ÿ”ฒ
@glitchwitch.eth
Too much math :(
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cristian ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Cristian ๐ŸŽฉ
@cristianisbased.eth
Mmmm so what you're saying is only 2k badges after they are unhidden? ๐Ÿค”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

joshisdead.eth pfp
joshisdead.eth
@joshisdead.eth
Here comes the formula ๐Ÿคฉ @woj.eth for supercast, if u add powerbadge, I might go back
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ako pfp
Ako
@ako1988
Many times I described this circle to folks around , but they searched for algorithms in getting like by who ever they knew :))))
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction