Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Prioritized list of channels pain points 1. Moderation set up is confusing / high friction 2. Inability to turn off Recent feed 3. Inability to control algo of Main feed 4. Lack of hide / ban (exists through mod tools, but high friction to set up) 5. Lack of co-hosts (similarly, exists in mod tools) Agree? Disagree?
24 replies
4 recasts
102 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
I also wish I could still use automod rules replies. Reply spam junks up threads.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Most people have priority mode on and don't see them.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
Do you have the breakdown of users using everyone mode vs priority mode?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
90%+ are using priority mode (it's the default). Might be even higher.
7 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Oโ“‚๏ธid ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Oโ“‚๏ธid ๐ŸŽฉ
@omidxyz
It would be better if the default setting for such restrictive options was set to "everybody," and users could change it if they needed. I am sure that many users do not even know that this option is active for them.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Most people don't want that, though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Oโ“‚๏ธid ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Oโ“‚๏ธid ๐ŸŽฉ
@omidxyz
Of course, you are better informed. But i think the fair way is make it off by default and anyone need it can turn it on. But ultimately, it's you who decides which option is better.๐Ÿซก We simply suggested what we feel might be better.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction