A stockcoin is similar to a stablecoin along two dimensions:

Global demand — Analog asset people want to hold digitally

Backed — Digital asset is 1:1 backed with analog asset at a traditional institution in an FBO account

https://x.com/litocoen/status/1896195407874830506

Stockcoins are also similar to stablecoins in that the issuer benefits from revenue analog streams that aren't easily distributed to the onchain asset (at least today)

Stablecoin - interest from treasuries and other assets backing the 1:1 peg

Stockcoin - dividends, short seller lending

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

would make rebalancing COIN so much easier if it was listed on base w adequate liquidity

stockcoin infinitely better name than tokenized real world assets

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

to what extent can the incentive and spam algos work together to reward quality, truly engaging conversations that go deep into reply chains? 

change the meta. 

make it easier to navigate reply chains and highlight high quality replies that the incentive mechanism rewards in the home feed.

any particular rationale you follow when deciding whether to reply to your own cast or QC yourself?

asking because of conversations here on FC about how QCs have taken over replies because of limited reply visibility (partly rewards driven)

any ability to use incentive and spam algos to drive a change in the meta from QCs back to replies without it immediately getting gamed?

any particular rationale you follow when deciding whether to reply to your own cast or QC yourself?

asking because of conversations here on FC about how QCs have taken over replies because of limited reply visibility (partly rewards driven)

any ability to use incentive and spam algos to drive a change in the meta from QCs back to replies without it immediately getting gamed?

https://warpcast.com/eirrann.eth/0xfab87287