Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
It sure would make for spicy (and informative) discussion/debate during FarCon Unfortunately, I have been gatekept from attending https://warpcast.com/v/0x0c272dca https://warpcast.com/geoffgolberg/0xe3048478
7 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
Debate is always useful, I don't know maybe he misrepresented your opinion, but I do think that banning at the protocol level is a very poor solution. My preferred solution is open-sourced labeling algorithms. But IMO Warpcast already bans people in the form of shadowban, which is the worst form of ban, it's better to ban someone temporarily or permanently at the client level but never do a shadowban, shadowbanning should be illegal, I don't care if it helps fighting the bots or not because is the definition of lack of transparency, and has been weaponized too many times to control distribution in a specific way.
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
All of our labels are public.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Andrei O. pfp
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
Again, it's just a statement without an open-source backend there is no concrete proof. You could 100k secret labels, or you could tell the truth, but it is not provable just by a team member saying it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction