Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
"Why do you keep telling people what to do?" "Stop being a hall monitor!" "People aren't going to change." Sure, but better to be clear upfront when we start tweak the spam labeling algorithms. re: hall monitor — yes, I am. Quality is what drives growth, that requires rules and taste. If you don't like those rules / taste, use or build another client. Beauty of a decentralized system. And to be clear: if you're just casting in your own timeline or channels, algo won't care about it. It's when you start taxing other people's attention (and potentially making the experience worse for others), that you might get labeled.
31 replies
2 recasts
80 reactions
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
there should be a process to it. yes, you’re labeled as spam. to remove this label do this and state how long it will take for a user to leave spam.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What happens when the person reverts to spamming again?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
This is a cast pleading with you to remove everyone from spam. i know some users will definitely revert back to spamming but then no one can blame the system because you gave them a chance and a detailed explanation of what to avoid doing to not get labeled as “spam”. right now it doesn’t seem fair. https://warpcast.com/fwkiraa/0xa7dd2c35
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
law
@traguy.eth
That’s why it’s an algo We have the arkose test on X and after several labels, the account gets banned Not saying it has to be the same thing but that’s an actual implementation We can’t say getting out of spam where there are hundreds of thousands of users is “MANUAL” That’s in no way a great thing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction