Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
21 recasts
21 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How to think about Farcaster protocol data
17 replies
53 recasts
319 reactions

Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
appreciate the ongoing transparency dwr ✊ has me thinking about channels gating/data do you see a future where channels can be 1. permissionless to cast in (no host) 2. “centralized” w full/partial host control then let the users decide which they prefer? do you see this being on a client by client basis?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1 is could only work if you show the user content based on their graph. 2 is what we have now with hosts?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
yep 2 is what we have, at least how i see it tbh i think it’s working really well, as long as the ability to create a new channel remains open in perpetuity for number 1, i guess i’d just be curious to know if it’s even possible to have a fully decentralized channel where the creator gives up all control of it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction