Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Hearing rumblings that people are slightly concerned about the channel leads experiment. AMA!
19 replies
1 recast
27 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I don’t like being pedantic, but shouldn’t this be posted in the Warpcast channel? 😀
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Channels are a Farcaster primitive. Working to decentralize them progressively.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
That's good to know. I had the impression that it was a Warpcast feature. Thanks for clarifying!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Channels are just a brand name for FIP-2. Channel leads are Warpcast only for now. https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/71
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Yes I'm aware of the FIP-2 part. My impression was that channels is a curated set of FIP-2 discussions: Warpcast implements their channels, other apps implement their own, there's nothing blocking any app using them, but the Warpcast list is controlled by Warpcast.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction