Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Update on channels 1. It's not a top priority right now 2. Channels are not expiring; if we end up moving forward with an expiration, we will give advanced notice; consider it an indefinite grace period 3. When it becomes a priority, we will resolve abandoned and squatted channels as part of the expiration; we will likely decentralize channel creation at that point — however, only when a top priority 4. What's higher priority than channels? a. Continue to improve frames UX, especially with regard to onchain interactions b. Improve discovery across Farcaster for anyone building / creating something onchain c. Snapchain — need to scale the underlying protocol d. Cheaper sign ups — top request from several existing apps with large user bases considering integrating with Farcaster e. Migrating Sign in with Farcaster to Farcaster Connect (see FIP) to allow other clients to provide auth for apps / frames f. Rewards and onboarding improvements around invites
22 replies
29 recasts
203 reactions
Brenner
@brenner.eth
d. seems like something Merkle can fix with $ (abundant), instead of time & energy (scarce)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Permissioned vs. permissionless
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brenner
@brenner.eth
Could give the large apps some grant of money to pay for the signups for their existing (qDAU) users Seems like a fine tradeoff for permissioned vs permissionless for now
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We've offered them that (for the last 6 months). People don't like the idea of integrating deeply into a system that requires ongoing relationship with a funding source.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
