Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The limiting factor for Farcaster’s growth is the supply of high-quality interesting / entertaining organic content. Most people who are focused on creating content optimize for networks with large existing audiences because while hard to break through, the upside is massive. Solve for X.
36 replies
64 recasts
231 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
“Just pay content creators to post on Farcaster” Top content creators realize any direct payment will be small and short-term relative to compounding value of a large audience on an at-scale network. Monetization through distribution, eg launch a brand, angel investing, etc. So you run into an adverse selection problem. The people who are interested in getting paid by a sub-scale network vs. playing the game on hard mode.
3 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
One thing Farcaster can/could offer that other networks can't is analytics. Many "top content creators" usually like being able to measure the performance of their content. Views, views over time, per post, per user, user segments, reactions, reactions over time per user segment, click-though rates, reach, etc. (+ Combine onchain activity with all this) An other is monetization. Ideally, direct monetization. Not sure how the substance model could be implemented on Farcaster. I guess Paragraph is trying to do things in this direction.
5 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
While I agree, numbers are too small today to matter.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions