Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
I'd love for either the Warpcast team or a dedicated client for direct casts offer a pay to message feature - you pay into escrow, and if the other party responds, the funds are sent to the other party This incentivizes responses to important DCc, and esp for some people it literally puts a value on their time You could probably enhance it further by letting the sending party decide whether the response was satisfactory before releasing the escrow funds This could all be done with Warps or USDC
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We've considered this, but I suspect the people the market would value the attention of the most aren't motivated enough by per message fees. Still may be useful as a primitive for marketing messages, though.
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
Thats a fair assumption From a marketing standpoint it might be really useful If I'm launching a new project using the Farcaster social graph as the GTM and I have a bunch of priority users to engage with and onboard with, I would pay a reasonable sum to ensure that my message gets through to them Perhaps its not a per message fee but a monthly subscription to DC Priority mode - if you use it your messages are pinned at the top of a users DCs until they open/respond
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jorge Schnura
@schnura
Would be like LinkedIn's InMails (big revenue source for them) but users getting paid, which is already much better
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cyber Shakti 🎩😇😈💃
@cybershakti
funny how pay to go ad-free in web2 but here in web3 we're building stuff to get us paid to suffer them in our DMs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brandon Owens
@spareventures
Seems many people on Twitter who “don’t need the money” still were quite excited to talk about getting paid from tweeting. You’re probably right about top 1% globally popular but people can still be very important in a niche who would like free money.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
