Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you don’t like the “make money” consumer value prop for Farcaster—what do you think is better? Reply with a suggestion and rationale. Like replies that resonate.
154 replies
80 recasts
525 reactions

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
@art had a suggestion https://warpcast.com/artlu/0xa0042100
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
As a consumer why do I care about open? Web2 networks are open.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
I hear you & tend to agree It was Art's suggestion. I don't think it sucks. It wasn't offered in the context of 'value proposition'. All the caveats now aside... Make money comes off as transactional & mercenary. There's something more aspirational to be had from a user's perspective eg becoming a successful entrepreneur before answering the Q, let me confirm the 'positioning' of FC (my QAD word salad): Farcaster is a decentralized, developer-friendly social protocol that enables anyone to build and own their social experience. & the positioning of WC: Warpcast is the first & best way to experience Farcaster, combining the familiarity of Twitter with the intimacy of group chats, giving users more control over their identity and data. We are looking for a value prop for FC so I'd try on these themes: -Own your identity and content—move between apps without losing your followers or history. OR my fav -Build without platform risk—Farcaster is an open social protocol where apps and communities thrive.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction