Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
In case you missed it: what does sufficient decentralization mean? https://dwr.email/what-does-sufficient-decentralization-mean
16 replies
9 recasts
47 reactions
vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I think you/we are on the right path. If I have to be more strict: - This definition does not have to do with decentralization, I would call it "sufficiently censorship resistant". Decentralization is an implementation that usually favors it, but there's not a 1-to-1 relationship. - Farcaster is censorship resistant right now, but it is extremely easy to lose this property the next moment: You just have to push a hub update, and all hubs will update to the new, censored version. And if I try to run the old version, it probably won't work because of the specific dynamics of the current network. Of course, may say "well, go ahead and implement your version, etc.", and I will respond, "no, no, it's ok, it's good enough for now" 🤣
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
potato pfp
potato
@potato
Could you make the back button close the mini app and go back to the feed instead of closing warpcast entirely? I never use the back button to close an app that's what the home button is for, thanks
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu.eth
great read, also @reidtandy this is a much better experience!! well done
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
kevin mfer 🎩 pfp
kevin mfer 🎩
@kevinmfer
wow a purple button
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
binocularsXL🎩 pfp
binocularsXL🎩
@binocularsx
The fact that it came up as a mini app is just the best. Had to come back before reading it lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
it would be so great if clicking *Read* opened an article that i could scroll, or even an external link, but unfortunately, that's not the case
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alemac pfp
Alemac
@alemac
I missed it. Thanks for sharing it again. Sometimes I wonder to myself what would happen if we had an open source Warpcast...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
d_ttang pfp
d_ttang
@ttang.eth
Don't listen to the flatterers' nice words, but see the vision of the real builders who want to build together.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
d_ttang pfp
d_ttang
@ttang.eth
Who said: A bilion-plus daily active users of the ( Farcaster ) protocol, thousands of apps and services and any interest you have or any guirk in terms of the way you wish something existed. Now? Warpcast is almost a monopoly
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Monica Talan 🌐 🍄🎭 pfp
Monica Talan 🌐 🍄🎭
@monitalan
I talked about @v's post yesterday when asked about decentralization - now I need to read yours. I do appreciate how much you each share and engage with users.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
d_ttang pfp
d_ttang
@ttang.eth
Just one question can illustrate whether farcaster is "sufficiently decentralized": if warpcast is gone, will farcaster still exist? The definition of existence is whether there will be people running Hubble, whether there will be developers building Farcaster, whether Farcaster will attract more developers to build, and whether Farcaster will grow into the infrastructure of web3. Come and vote !!! https://canvass.fun/p/g811p4
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DegenFans 🎩🔵🫂Ⓜ️ pfp
DegenFans 🎩🔵🫂Ⓜ️
@degenfans
Do we need an approval also for those composer mini apps?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
d_ttang pfp
d_ttang
@ttang.eth
We came for decentralized social (community), but Warpcast monopolized the community (Channel). This alone makes other clients far behind. hope to decentralize the channel as soon as possible, or open more channel interfaces, such as channel creating
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bridget📍 pfp
Bridget📍
@bbridget
Will this take us out of the app? 😶‍🌫
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
riya 🎩🍖Ⓜ️😹🦋 pfp
riya 🎩🍖Ⓜ️😹🦋
@nmeow.eth
Yeah! *Interesting content"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction