3 replies
10 recasts
55 reactions
I think you/we are on the right path.
If I have to be more strict:
- This definition does not have to do with decentralization, I would call it "sufficiently censorship resistant". Decentralization is an implementation that usually favors it, but there's not a 1-to-1 relationship.
- Farcaster is censorship resistant right now, but it is extremely easy to lose this property the next moment: You just have to push a hub update, and all hubs will update to the new, censored version. And if I try to run the old version, it probably won't work because of the specific dynamics of the current network.
Of course, may say "well, go ahead and implement your version, etc.", and I will respond, "no, no, it's ok, it's good enough for now" 🤣 0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions