Since this day, we're at 50x the message count, 180x the peer count, ~40x the db size. Perf metrics are harder to compare since it was during an incident but currently p95 merge latency is ~30ms and p95 gossip delay is <1s (vs 2000ms and ~2.5hrs during the incident)

The team has been making steady, behind-the-scenes improvements to Hubs and the protocol.

Not out of the woods yet, but the team has scaled Hubs significantly.

And we have a public dashboard related to Warpcast's sync to Hub performance here:

status.warpcast.com

have y'all thought about creating a barrier to standing up nodes? like stake ETH in order to be able to standup a node? actually idk how you'd enforce that so maybe nvm

yes but that's not the problem right now. if it was just about reducing the number we would consider that. running up on the frontier of libp2p

yes but that's not the problem right now. if it was just about reducing the number we would consider that. running up on the frontier of libp2p

https://libp2p.io