Since this day, we're at 50x the message count, 180x the peer count, ~40x the db size. Perf metrics are harder to compare since it was during an incident but currently p95 merge latency is ~30ms and p95 gossip delay is <1s (vs 2000ms and ~2.5hrs during the incident)

The team has been making steady, behind-the-scenes improvements to Hubs and the protocol.

Not out of the woods yet, but the team has scaled Hubs significantly.

And we have a public dashboard related to Warpcast's sync to Hub performance here:

status.warpcast.com

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

yes but that's not the problem right now. if it was just about reducing the number we would consider that. running up on the frontier of libp2p

yes but that's not the problem right now. if it was just about reducing the number we would consider that. running up on the frontier of libp2p

https://libp2p.io

have y'all thought about creating a barrier to standing up nodes? like stake ETH in order to be able to standup a node? actually idk how you'd enforce that so maybe nvm

Thanks. Can confirm my 1000 hubs are running seamlessly

Congratulations! Your cast has been curated by @tuangg and featured on https://casterbites.com/bites

Remember, any Farcaster user can send and vote for the best casts of the day

curious how many hubs running atm after you stated clearly that no rewards for running hub

Great job we appreciate all your hard work making this place the way it is!
 69 $degen

well shit pictures ain't working no more :/ 
￼

Remind us, what kind of rewards do users running a hub get?

I kid, I kid

Big thanks to you Dan for always improving the system.

I wondered how you were coping with the engagement spike, apparently here it is