Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Farcaster should implement a standard for combining threads into longcasts BECAUSE quality ideas expressed in text often take more than 280 characters. X allows long posts, and they are EXCELLENT. Why should I need a blog or a newsletter to communicate longer ideas in text. One network, unlimited expression.
10 replies
4 recasts
43 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Client opportunity! :) Revealed preference is most people are fine with a link to a Paragraph or Substack.
6 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I tend to write long and detailed replies here, which leads me to splitting them over several casts (which is painful to do). They wouldn’t be suitable for a blog post — I’m just responding to someone, not creating original IP. But I’ll accept I’m in the minority.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
How is this revealed preference? I use long tweets all the time, and they get lots of engagement. Clicking off to a separate site cannot have as good engagement as native long posts.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
TBH, a small change in Hubble to allow up to 20 embedded CastIds would: 1. Allow a nice 20-casts long cast 2. Would not have any impact on storage (I'm 99% sure that 20 CastIds < 2 x 256 bytes URLs allowed today.)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑
@mikedemarais.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vincent
@pixel
screenshot essays also work well
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nalo
@nalo
did farcaster always count url links as part of the character limit?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
