Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wijuwiju.eth pfp
wijuwiju.eth
@wijuwiju.eth
let people own some of it. Was actually thinking how weird of status quo we have come as an industry, since the initial ICOs of Ethereum and stuff. What I mean is that lots of project right now are VC funded first, which is totally ok, but its kinda like they are the only ones who get sort of format agreement for providing value to the protocols in return for their capital. Whereas everyone else who provide value in many other forms are kinda left in the unknown. Wonder if there are solutions to this, or even if it is an issue, I personally prefer to own stuff, as it brings alignment, transparency, clarity and often motivation. Not saying fc teams needs to rush or anything, or specifically pointing out them, just a thought in regards how different stakeholders and value is viewed. Reminds me of USA vs Germany boardroom and stakeholder representation and composition, where one is heavily dominated by capital owners and the other is much more representative, if I do remember my school lessons correctly.
5 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What are they owning?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

wijuwiju.eth pfp
wijuwiju.eth
@wijuwiju.eth
/farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
But what does that mean? What does the ownership entitle you to?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

wijuwiju.eth pfp
wijuwiju.eth
@wijuwiju.eth
imho ownership is sufficient in by itself, it literally entitles me the right to own, or I'm being delusional here.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

{ Lawson.fm } ⭕️ pfp
{ Lawson.fm } ⭕️
@lwsnbaker
How about we start with accountability?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Artyom Grislis pfp
Artyom Grislis
@agrislis.eth
have the opportunity to participate in making some decisions (for example, collectively determine possible moderation formats) + the right to dividends if conditions are met
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction