Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1/ Farcaster onchain signers - Signers are onchain which gives more control to developers - There is a cost associated with onchain - Most users are on mobile - Apple doesn't allow crypto in-app payments - Make it easy w/o crypto is best path for most people - It’s 100% possible to create signers outside of Warpcast
5 replies
3 recasts
18 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
2/ - Warpcast was covering the cost for all onchain protocol actions until recently - 10/100/1000x quality DAU is the most important thing to focus on - Other clients and wallets are able to create flows similar to that use crypto on web, e.g. caststorage.com
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
welter
@fun
what's the % of active users difference between mobile and desktop
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
How are Lens apps getting into the app store? I'm asking because you can even get paid directly in your wallet when you recast or like something. You can mint posts directly there, so you are actually doing crypto in app payments. Is this something different?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
woj
@woj.eth
for people like me trying to catch up what even are signers https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/103
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
How can we keep https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/blob/main/docs/SPECIFICATION.md in sync with finalised FIPs? For example, GetOnChainSigner is not mentioned in it. Maybe the final step of a FIP is to update/annotate the spec?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
