Farcaster

1/ Farcaster onchain signers

- Signers are onchain which gives more control to developers
- There is a cost associated with onchain
- Most users are on mobile
- Apple doesn't allow crypto in-app payments
- Make it easy w/o crypto is best path for most people
- It’s 100% possible to create signers outside of Warpcast

2/ 

- Warpcast was covering the cost for all onchain protocol actions until recently

- 10/100/1000x quality DAU is the most important thing to focus on 

- Other clients and wallets are able to create flows similar to that use crypto on web, e.g. caststorage.com

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

product @seedclub. we built @crowdfund. i interview crypto builders @ web3galaxybrain.com.

> There is a cost associated with onchain

Signers are like a decentralized and user-controlled version of OAuth tokens but onchain.

App creates a keypair, user does a signature authorizing that signature to act on its behalf, result is stored onchain.

Adds and deletes happen onchain.

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), @l--o--l (fun). devcoin:$lemon3

+1 for the App Store/warpcast approach.

Just a note: Key difference compared to storage payment via cast storage.com, is that for the signers flow the app will also need the user's farcaster keypair, which raises the bar higher.