Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
epic fail
11 replies
13 recasts
147 reactions
kia
@kia
imagine the type of futuristic world we'd be living in if we'd embraced nuclear
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
EulerLagrangodamus - bank/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
@0xserious
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Roberto Bayardo ๐ฉ
@bayardo.eth
It's cute that all the libertarian bros who vehemently denied fossil fuels caused global warming are now embracing nuclear because it doesn't.
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
Jerry-d ๐๐ฝ๐ฉ โ
@jerry-d
In hindsight, yes. But back then? I was in grade school and lived near Harrisburg at the time and parents were asking schools if they had nuclear fallout shelters. IKYK - the Cuban missile crisis was still fresh in everyoneโs minds and the threat of global thermonuclear war was so omnipresent they made end-of-world movies about it. War Games, Terminator, etc. Fast forward 45 years, Iโm looking forward to what Microsoft will do with it.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
makemake
@makemake
the world not being powered by nuclear is such a scam
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
GIGAMฮSH
@gigamesh
I got the impression from the podcast your wife & Packy did that public opinion was actually a small reason for nuclear becoming a small part of the energy mix. Sounded like fossil fuels being cheaper & less risky was the main problem. Also a much more politically powerful industry.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jj ๐
@jj
Whatโs crazy is I remember reading that oil companies encouraged pro-solar people who protested and shut down nuclear programs/sites
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ciefa ๐ eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
link to paper?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Icetoad ๐ฉ ๐ ๐ถ ๐ ๐
@icetoad.eth
Anti nuclear power people usually bring up Chernobyl, but even that example is still not as bad as the numbers you've highlighted here.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DV (insert a lot of emojis)
@degenveteran.eth
I believe increasing transparency on information like this will help expedite the corrections needed to take to make up for loss time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Reeeny
@reeeny
But then again no other power source screams "eternity costs" like nuclear power. There isn't even a wikipedia entry in English, because apparently people don't think further than their lifetime. And these are externalized costs as well. Sometimes things aren't as easy as we want them to be.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
