How to ship fast as a small company looking for product-market fit

1. Avoid side quests. If you aren't coding, selling or talking to users, it's a side quest. 

2. Eliminate process. Don't cargo cult your team into sprint planning, offsites or recurring 1:1s. Gather once a day, talk about what to ship and ship it.  

3. Hire people who love to ship fast all the time. Most people cannot do this correctly or do not enjoy doing it. 

4. Don't hire people who can't ship. It's temping to get an ea, bd rep or community manager to offload work. This usually just creates more work for you. 

5. Have a simple and fast tech stack. A new hire should be able to write a feature in a day and deploy it to users in 30 minutes.

Related: partnerships almost never work and especially harmful for moving fast.

1. If you're a fast-moving startup, most if not all companies will move slower than you. Waiting on another company to hold up their end of the deadline is de-motivating for your team. 

2. Coordinating a "big bang" launch takes a lot of work and usually doesn't make a huge impact.

Instead, a better way to do partnerships:

1. Tell the other party what your plans are and the deadline for being included. Be clear that you will ship whether ready or not.

2. If they miss the deadline but finish a few days / week later, just announce as a follow on.

Related: partnerships almost never work and especially harmful for moving fast.

1. If you're a fast-moving startup, most if not all companies will move slower than you. Waiting on another company to hold up their end of the deadline is de-motivating for your team. 

2. Coordinating a "big bang" launch takes a lot of work and usually doesn't make a huge impact.

Instead, a better way to do partnerships:

1. Tell the other party what your plans are and the deadline for being included. Be clear that you will ship whether ready or not.

2. If they miss the deadline but finish a few days / week later, just announce as a follow on.

https://warpcast.com/v/0x5f08d01e

ideally, zero dependency is best if you can building all components of a launch yourself.

but when you're in a 'partner' vs build everything yourself scenario, coordination is unavoidable. what's worked for you to actually ship together in a fast and cheap way?

onchain reputation at karma3labs and @openrank

I have a hard time thinking of a partnership that's been meaningful in the last few years.

Important progress for making USDC the programmable money for US fintech.

If Block wasn't Bitcoin maximalists, could see a Coinbase + Stripe + Block + Circle consortium make USDC the de facto rail for building new fintech products.

cc @jda.eth 

https://x.com/patrickc/status/1806598087265096117

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xb5c474d3 ?

I like baking /goodbread and building apps on web3 protocols. DevRel @ ENS Labs. gregskril.com

haha, largely agree.
my take from recent learnings - self-serve integrations are far more scalable than 1:1 partnerships to launch something. forces the team to think hard about the core value, iteration cycles, scalability, distribution, cost.

how do team that needs artists ship w/ no partners? say someone like titles.xyz that rely on quality models. is that another way of saying, everything should be self serve in software? seems silly i'm asking but diff between partners and customers?