Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Related: partnerships almost never work and especially harmful for moving fast. 1. If you're a fast-moving startup, most if not all companies will move slower than you. Waiting on another company to hold up their end of the deadline is de-motivating for your team. 2. Coordinating a "big bang" launch takes a lot of work and usually doesn't make a huge impact. Instead, a better way to do partnerships: 1. Tell the other party what your plans are and the deadline for being included. Be clear that you will ship whether ready or not. 2. If they miss the deadline but finish a few days / week later, just announce as a follow on. https://warpcast.com/v/0x5f08d01e
10 replies
8 recasts
84 reactions

sahil pfp
sahil
@sahil
ideally, zero dependency is best if you can building all components of a launch yourself. but when you're in a 'partner' vs build everything yourself scenario, coordination is unavoidable. what's worked for you to actually ship together in a fast and cheap way?
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
A big reason why large companies move so slow. Everything is based on partnerships between different parts of the org and even between teams on the same org. You count projects in terms of quarters when you need to convince another team to first add an OKR and then convince them to make it a P1 and not a P2. đŸ€ź
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

meta-davidđŸŽ© | Building Scoop3 pfp
meta-davidđŸŽ© | Building Scoop3
@metadavid
Respectfully disagree. First, not every partnership is product-focused and involves shipping something. Second, even if it does include shipping, and they’re dragging their feet, then you have mismatched priorities. Thats why you have people who specialize in partnerships. Their job is to vet the partnership, ensure synergies & alignment, and keep the train on the tracks.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Gosh I needed this reminder today. Thanks WC team.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

patxol đŸ”· anser.social  pfp
patxol đŸ”· anser.social
@patxol.eth
I do agree, but I think it is a very product centric statement. There are other ways to be partners, and they are as valuable as a product integration. Joint marketing, similar positions on market trends, non agression pacts, are also valuable.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rch đŸŽ©  pfp
Rch đŸŽ©
@rch
are there examples. where you have seen them work and what made them work?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joan Westenberg pfp
Joan Westenberg
@daojoan.eth
This is excellent advice
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Aunt HoⓂie pfp
Aunt HoⓂie
@infinitehomie
What is meant by partnerships? Co-founder, or company? (Do you’ mean something different than your relationship with @v ?)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ChristianØ pfp
ChristianØ
@christian
Agreed. This has been a brutal wake up call for me in the first year of marketing our products. Any collaboration was just too much waiting on the other party. The partnerships were there, but product collaboration takes time and getting the word out is always the last thing to go.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

zhengxian pfp
zhengxian
@diandiange
go
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction