Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Looking for feedback on this iteration for channels The single biggest remaining complaint is people feeling like the pre-existing, large, topic based channels like /food or /founders should be more accesible. It will also reduce work for channel mods who don't want to have to approve every single person who wants to cast in their channel, but are OK giving up some control of who (and they can always invite someone to be a member to guarantee it). Curious: 1. Would you turn this on or off for your channel? 2. Any concerns? https://warpcast.notion.site/Public-mode-11f6a6c0c10180869699c725fa9e02e3
36 replies
7 recasts
75 reactions
Zach Davidson
@zd
Good goal, but I think you need to pick a default Right now, channels kinda feel all over the place (evidence = the amount of questions you get about them) As a frequent user, I like the public mode design for big "hashtag" channels But for new users, this might lead to more questions / confusion / fatigue (ie. Why is this channel different than that channel?) *** If the goal is protocol growth, seems like your choices are: 1. Default small communities, intertwined by main feed or 2. Default massive broadcast network with ability to join smaller communities if desired Nuanced point, but defaults matter a lot here IMO
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We may just turn this on for all channels and let people opt-out with a click. Challenge is pre-existing big channels that aren't actively moderated. Better to let people participate in them.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Zach Davidson
@zd
Yep, prob a good move to go default public w/ one click opt out
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
