i made a kinda dumb cast month or so ago that i didn’t respect anon accounts that have nothing to lose so they attack people. 

i should’ve been more nuanced. 

i think pseudonymous accounts like roon, daniel, formerly beff jezos are essential to growing a social platform — and farcaster needs them. are any here?

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

I don’t know the answer but am wondering looking back at history and major social change… how much does anonymity play a role over privacy and secrecy? I feel anonymity is not as great as some make it out to be.

agree, it isn't that much of a feature generally speaking.

the pseudanon accounts i'm thinking of are more "brands" than "individuals" where the ultimate beneficiary is the audience / community, rather than the person behind the account.

warpcast.com/ted/0x75e85a83

Revolutionizing the way we tell, share, and discover stories. US Army Veteran. Husband and Dad. Regen $Degen. MT by way of marriage| nf.td/dbkw 

After pushing cast I started thinking about DoctrineMan. This guy was a speak-truth-to-power anon. He was the subject of a couple of 4 Star General inquiries. He was not platform specific…but your description holds from a profession standpoint…this case military profession.