Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/crypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Sometimes I wonder if people don't realize the extent of how crypto's reputation is absolutely ๐๐๐๐๐๐ outside crypto circles. Large overlap with the "AI sucks" people. However, that one will fade as AI has obvious use-cases for individuals and groups which don't require network effects to be successful. AI will succeed and the "AI sucks" people will be seen as luddites, path-independently. Crypto however - at least the originally-intended version as democratized peer-to-peer money - can only succeed with network effects going its way. Same goes for a network like Farcaster, where we can see from this thread that crypto's reputation is a large reason why folks aren't being invited here. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x51d1875b Trust and reputations are difficult to rebuild. I worry it may be too little too late. The scenario I fear most is the one where crypto is relegated to boring settlement backend tech for tradfi, providing none of its promised self-sovereignty benefits to individuals.
4 replies
6 recasts
21 reactions
Dorp D. Dorp
@dorpdorp
Many years ago I saw ZK with decentralized auth and micropayments via channels as a way for the internet to be advert free and pay as you go, you pay for the compute to render the page and contribute towards storage costs and distribute revenue to content creators and participants. This will never happen thoughโฆ
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Yep, not as long as the Big Tech people don't let it. https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0x72fd0b6d https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0x9a2f6e03
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
