Jack Dishman
@dish
Check out @lobstermindset.eth's writeup on the novel approach we're taking to maximize creator revenue during the first swaps, benefitting creators by capturing more value from snipers. Couldn't be more proud to be working alongside Lily & Co. 🦞
3 replies
6 recasts
41 reactions
vitaliek.base.eth
@vitaliek.eth
did Proxy snipe 9% of the Clanker supply, yes or no? how much of the supply does he still hold? people need answers, why is the team avoiding answers these simple yet extremely important questions?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jack Dishman
@dish
clanker devco holds just about 9% of supply https://x.com/jackdishman/status/1920142569029132506?s=46&t=Tbj5CdZbpQ0wx01I9YBuDw more context https://x.com/jackdishman/status/1919816991319224524?s=46&t=Tbj5CdZbpQ0wx01I9YBuDw
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
vitaliek.base.eth
@vitaliek.eth
can you explain this then? https://basescan.org/token/0x1bc0c42215582d5a085795f4badbac3ff36d1bcb?a=0x2cde9919e81b20b4b33dd562a48a84b54c48f00c according to basescan, Hedgey Finance wallets hold 129,000 Clanker it also shows 90,000 clanker (exactly 9% of supply) was added in November and moved out of that wallet later that must be Proxy. any clarification about that please?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vitaliek.base.eth
@vitaliek.eth
so you are saying that 8.2% is the same as the "9%" Proxy talked about getting at launch in November? will we get an update on the amicable resolution you're trying to get with him? clanker is one of the worst performers and that's likely because he still controls a significant supply, creating sell pressure, or withholding from buying because they think he does
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction