dimsome pfp

dimsome

@dimsome.eth

276 Following
101 Followers
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Gm
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Don't be so salty, it will just gonna turn you into a potato chip.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
try potato?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Gm
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Ready to claim $STRK? Would you dump or hold the provision? @starknet I don't have the answers but when you make up your mind it's important to consider the vesting/unlock schedule. In just a few years the supply will double a few times. NFA Source: https://token.unlocks.app/starknet
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
How to do you distribute the packets?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
sad day for russia
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
BTW, not saying bankless shoundn't own the channel, I just think It should have been decided differently. They could have also just registered /banklessHQ channel?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Just thinking it can become dangerous if we start to do a bunch of backroom deals and exceptions for specific entities. If squatting is the problem, then we need better solutions that just taking it away because someone decided it's amoral.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Exactly, your actions do not match the implied rules (as you mentioned in the ideal fully decentralised scenario). Morals of why someone initially creates a channel are beside the point if we think about something that can be as credible and neutral as possible.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
I would assume the whole restaking mania plays a big role.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
dope movie, but I am not sure it tries to glorify the path to greatness portrait
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
- Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Therefore we have the right to take is away? - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - Then we need a better first come first serve system, if they would have been fully decentralised, what would you do then?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Validator queue starting to build up again, now +2 days.
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Thanks for looking out for smool builders, very based
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Thank you @base for supporting small projects !
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
always a good time to stack and stake
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Benefits: - No additional "Node operator software" - No additional token for colleteral - Anyone can participate and borrow against a validator, and potentially spin up more validators - Direct market-driven pricing mechanisms
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
mTOR activation is also reduced in older people, while sarcopenia increases. It's not that simple...
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Pretty sure as soon as the bullish eposide is up, we mark the local high and dump for a few months.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions