Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A reminder on channels - Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - When channels are decentralized and incorporated into the protocol later this year (likely onchain!), then you can do what you want! Just like FIDs
0 reply
29 recasts
281 reactions

dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
- Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Therefore we have the right to take is away? - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - Then we need a better first come first serve system, if they would have been fully decentralised, what would you do then?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> Therefore we have the right to take is away? Currently, yes! In the future, no. > if they would have been fully decentralised, what would you do then? If it was decentralized, then I couldn't? :) Question for you: Is it moral for a squatter to extract value from something they didn't build?
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Exactly, your actions do not match the implied rules (as you mentioned in the ideal fully decentralised scenario). Morals of why someone initially creates a channel are beside the point if we think about something that can be as credible and neutral as possible.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

dimsome pfp
dimsome
@dimsome.eth
Just thinking it can become dangerous if we start to do a bunch of backroom deals and exceptions for specific entities. If squatting is the problem, then we need better solutions that just taking it away because someone decided it's amoral.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Actions are entirely consistent with the username policy and in this case the user lied to me about being good faith / not trying to sell when we told the other party he was waiting to sell. Also squatted 10+ brands. Channels are not credibly neutral until they are in the protocol. You're making a claim I never made.
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions