Request for feedback from frame devs:
- give frames a way to respond with an error message that will be displayed to a user.
- enables frames to give users quick feedback in response to user input

Request for feedback from frame devs:
- give frames a way to respond with an error message that will be displayed to a user.
- enables frames to give users quick feedback in response to user input

https://warpcast.notion.site/Frames-Errors-ddc965b097d44d9ea03ddf98498597c6?pvs=74

Building @warpcast and @farcaster, new dad, like making food

Is the value add over responding with a frame that the current input value can be preserved? performance? Is this an accessibility change? 

Perhaps this is possible via an accessible arial-label for images instead.

Or is this a way for broken frames to communicate the errors back (not helpful for users)?

Building open source via @frames, /open-frames to help Farcaster and decentralized social win. a16z CSX23. Side proj: farcasterchannels.com farcaster.id @search

mindful of scope creep - feels like errors may be more expressive and flexible via the frame image + some fallback label for accessibility/etc

if image renders become much faster (I think they will), and theres a minimal way to preserve input (you could also send back a input value in the frame spec - could be used for defaults as well), and libs make displaying errors in frame images easier, then this change would add scope to frames without adding much.

2x faster than a full image render
input state is preserved
makes building a frame with clean error handling simpler

still expect and encourage frames to use full frames in cases where that makes more sense