Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
One thing I was wrong about over the last few years: sign up costs would dramatically reduce spam. Turns out spam is a top 3 problem (aside from retention and infrastructure scaling) to solve for when building a permissionless decentralized social networking protocol. Spammers are willing to pay for sign ups at prices that normal users aren't. Spam is also relative: what's spammy for one person is not for another. Corollary: when you talk to developers building on Farcaster, spam is a top of mind issue whereas users giving product feedback but not actively building in the ecosystem tend to think this isn't that big an issue / not that hard a problem to solve. Also a good proxy for the quality of first principles thinking when suggesting "why don't you just do this?" if you haven't considered how would spammers abuse this and what's the solution.
28 replies
6 recasts
122 reactions

Greg Lang pfp
Greg Lang
@designheretic
Interesting 🤔 If cost is not a deterrent, filters are probably the next most viable candidate solution How salient would you say the risk is that filtering is likely to sweep in a meaningful swath of genuinely non-spammy content? (E.g. on the other app, talking about crypto at all limits your reach)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What would you use to filter? :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Greg Lang pfp
Greg Lang
@designheretic
Ideally I’d want a filter that I could feed specific examples of posts I don’t want to see that it would generalize my custom rules from I’d also want a “spam” timeline that I could check from time to time to flag posts it shouldn’t have filtered out—which it would use to fine-tune its general approach
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Challenge with this is the vast majority of users don't want to do work. They want smart defaults that just work. :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Greg Lang pfp
Greg Lang
@designheretic
I get that I’m not a typical customer—but I imagine I’m not the only one willing to work at fine-tuning Maybe filters of people willing to do work to fine-tune a filter could serve as templates that could be applied as a simple setting based on one-time choice during signup (think safe-search on DDG or Google)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
challenge is focus / prioritization. working on fine tuning doesn't help with growth, which is our biggest challenege
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction