Motte: the universe was created and is sometimes intervened in by an agentic entity ("god", "simulator"...)

Bailey: the Christian Bible has unique insight into the inner workings of that agentic entity

Two different claims (really, three different claims)

Motte: the universe was created and is sometimes intervened in by an agentic entity ("god", "simulator"...)

Bailey: the Christian Bible has unique insight into the inner workings of that agentic entity

Two different claims (really, three different claims)

https://x.com/jd_pressman/status/1812889834589212974

Your Bailey is technically a set of conjoint specific conclusions—in which your Motte is but a single member of the same set

So JDP is committing the conjunction fallacy