Are there plans to support more granular permissions for signers? 

Right now it feels like all or nothing. Would prefer to have scopes you can opt into:

- create cast
- delete cast
- react to cast
- update profile 

Also, would like the option to not delete casts when you revoke a signer.

𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓶𝓮𝓻 • building @buoy 🛟 • @dawnpatrol • pfista.com

no concrete plans

is there something specific that prompted this?

I've avoided trying new apps because the signer is too permissive. I assume there's a dampening effect on non-wc signer growth because giving away full access requires high trust. 

Less trust required == more usage

Also, ep 6 of doing numbers they talk through how a signer "abused" its access

Building @warpcast and @farcaster, new dad, like making food

Which granular permission would you have granted to the new app if the feature was available? 

Which permission would you have been more protective of?

I've avoided trying new apps because the signer is too permissive. I assume there's a dampening effect on non-wc signer growth because giving away full access requires high trust. 

Less trust required == more usage

Also, ep 6 of doing numbers they talk through how a signer "abused" its access https://bit.ly/4b3dEuk