Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
Farcaster Devs: Your Feedback is Requested we published a draft spec for App Frames https://warpcast.notion.site/app-frame-spec App Frames will replace Mini Apps and provide better performance, an expanded API, and won't require allowlisting questions and comments are appreciated
24 replies
44 recasts
166 reactions
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
I hope I got it wrong, but it seems app frames take more of farcaster specific direction rather than previous generic mini-app approach. I'm sure many would love to support their app outside of farcaster as well, e.g. telegram, world app, standalone web app. But I will also appreciate if the actual spec implementation will be more of plug-in rather than the framework for app frame development. Happy to see there will be an SDK to simplify authentication as well as leveraging farcaster specific functionality.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
is there something specific that makes you think it'll be hard to support apps outside Farcaster? I think it should be fairly straightforward to take an application and make it work as a Farcaster App Frame or standalone or for another platform
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
Not many specific cases for now, it's too early to be certain, but still wanted to share so you guys keep that in mind :) 1) Is primary button optional? I understand it's good to align the UX, looks nice, but might be an over-kill, especially if you already have button components with logic backed-in, and handling additional button logic doesn't make it appealing to me. 2) ethereumProvider - I assume should work fine with Privy, right, or should be handled separately? does this make mini-apps transaction spec obsolete?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
