Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
my take on the rebrand: do since it's a net benefit for everyone splitting was a good idea but it should've been the protocol that got a new name rather than the app this was the mistake, it doesn't make sense to build brand awareness and then assign it to a protocol that user's cant download and use rebrand fixes
1 reply
2 recasts
23 reactions
df
@df
it’s certainly not strictly a net benefit to third party client devs agree re split and names should be different
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions