denys on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Tucker Carlson interviewed Vladimir Putin in Moscow, Russia on February 6th, 2024. This thread reflects my thought process about the events around the conversation, the conversation itself and the following implications. Read on. https://youtube.com/watch?v=fOCWBhuDdDo

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

The announcement of the interview was apparently already too hot to handle for some people. A common point of view on the opposing spectrum was the fear of legitimizing a war criminal by providing Putin with a prominent platform.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

The very people having grown up under the privilege of freedom of speech found it once again appropriate to silence a key figure of a geopolitical conflict. Welcome to the civilized world.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Let's get all the smoke and mirrors out of the way first. Putin talked a great deal about the Russian history, going back thousands of years. He points to Neo Nazi movements that are apparently everywhere and have to be eliminated under all circumstances.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Putin talked about economic data and made all kinds of vitality comparisons to explain how strong Russia is and how the western aggression backfired. All of these nazi and econ narratives are rather irrelevant distractions from what actually matters here.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

What actually matters here is how we got here and how we can possibly move on together. The following contains a couple of pills that are quite hard to swollow. So I want to level set the reader and frame the conversation we have to have.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

The challenging circumstances in front of us are all about competence. It takes a lot of integrity and intellectual honesty to recognize that most decisions we have to make do in fact reside on a long spectrum of gray areas. Where we are going there are only few clearly identifiable rights and wrongs.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Your personal proximity to the issue will inevitably increase the magnitude of your cognitive bias on the matter at hand. We see many people perceiving something as propaganda. And the strategy those people often utilize to respond is their own version of propaganda. This is not helpful.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Now to the facts. All Russia wanted for the past 30 years was for NATO not to advance further. NATO did advance further. We knew advancing NATO lines further is perceived by Russia as aggression. And yet we did the aggressive thing, for decades. We knew what we were doing, and we did it anyway.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

denys pfp

Gotta comment on this point. If you are of an opinion that the expansion of NATO is solely a unilateral decision, you are perceiving the world through the glasses of the cold war. First and foremost, the countries that have joined NATO have done so bc they were willing to, and bc they wanted to distance from 🇷🇺.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction