Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
I think DAO governance should happen on Farcaster. It would be more enjoyable and easy so participation would rise. DAOs could finally actually benefit from the wisdom of crowds when beneficial, and be autonomous everywhere else.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

RichCL pfp
RichCL
@richcl
what part of governance? discussion? voting? delegation?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
Discussion can happen on the protocol itself. Voting and delegation can happen in frames.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RichCL pfp
RichCL
@richcl
I don't disagree.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RichCL pfp
RichCL
@richcl
It seems like a low lift for - a DAO to have a channel for discussions - @tallyxyz 's new proposals functionality framed - surfacing of key on-chain data points via a frame script what seems like a high lift: - switching costs of forums like discord, discourse, tg, etc - long form replies w/ multiple mentions
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dennison Bertram pfp
Dennison Bertram
@dennison
I totally agree. I think Farcaster could become the front door for most DAO’s and their delegates participation. Totally replacing the forums and temp checks and telegrams, etc… We have some bounties for folks to experiment with frames!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dennison Bertram pfp
Dennison Bertram
@dennison
https://warpcast.com/dennison/0x686411b7
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction