Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/cryptoleft
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
1 reply
3 recasts
9 reactions

rathermercurial.eth pfp
rathermercurial.eth
@rathermercurial.eth
But what if we negotiate transition of civic coordination infrastructure into decentralized, capture-resistant public goods? In most cases, those negotiations happen with governments, not states. So we can make real political gains while also providing valuable civil service that makes our communities more efficient and resilient.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
Yes to that but itโ€™d be a hard fight to negotiate for them to abdicate that kind of control
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rathermercurial.eth pfp
rathermercurial.eth
@rathermercurial.eth
Have you ever tried though? Municipal tech adoption is challenging, and not without its fair share of red tape. But it's not a conversation about politics and control. Never send a politician to do a software vendor's job. You're using the wrong door.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’ pfp
๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–š๐–’
@degencummunist.eth
โœŠ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ๐ŸคŒ Ok youโ€™re so right and I hadnโ€™t thought about going in the back sales door. Weโ€™re just making things easier, cheaper and more secure with our GaaS๐Ÿ˜น
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rathermercurial.eth pfp
rathermercurial.eth
@rathermercurial.eth
Even the libs seem to recognize that we need to lighten the load of the state, at the very least.. So it's not too radical to suggest using protocols and public digital infra ๐Ÿ‘
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction