Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Taken 50 km from the nearest population centre, this is the baseline now:
3 replies
3 recasts
16 reactions
0xRob > Devcon|DuneCon š¹š
@0xrob
Wait really? Don't they just recalibrate themselves to be at 420 when outside in fresh air?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Iām not aware of such functionality, would be cool though
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Oh yes, you actually can recalibrate it
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
Realistically you actually could be quite close to 450ppm though, the baseline does vary with elevation for example.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Inverse correlation?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
Honestly I'm not certain. I think the co2 sensor itself is impacted based on atmospheric pressure, possibly inversely (there's a really interesting technical thread I shared in the past, I can dig it up), but also since there's less atmosphere higher up in general I think the localized co2 fluctuations are more sensitive? That is, if there's a fire, the co2 spike will be more pronounced and last longer than at sea level? In theory co2 is heavier than o2 so it should go "Downhill" but in practice there's lots of valleys where co2 gets stuck (similar to "Dead zones" inside homes), sometimes for entire seasons until a storm passes through and dislodges it.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Dean Pierce šØāš»šš
@deanpierce.eth
When I was at ETH Denver I was getting readings of like 110 or so. I really should have taken a picture but I assumed it was broken, or that there was some sensor glitch because of the altitude. That might have been it.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
