Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
Just sharing my thoughts. I think it would have been better if Moxie had been launched when Warpcast had a large or rapidly growing user base, but unfortunately, that wasn’t the case, making the situation difficult. Initially, there was some demand for purchasing Moxie, but now, almost no one is buying it, and the Everyday Rewards distributed daily are being sold on the market each day. Although it seems like Far boost has created a use case for Moxie, this solution feels temporary, and I worry that after a certain point, it could lead to an even worse situation with more Moxie rewards being issued. Continuing in the reply below...
12 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
1/7 1. Issues Caused by Moxie Farming High-Rank Users: They experience inconvenience due to fake replies. Low-Rank Users: They are often mistakenly accused of being Moxie farmers. This situation leads to users doubting one another. Some top Moxie-earning farmers do not buy FT but instead sell everything.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
2/7 my thought: Remove Moxie points for replies. Anticipated Objection: "Good replies deserve rewards." Solution: Provide Moxie points for recast (quote) instead. We've already been using recast for this purpose even before Moxie was introduced.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
3/7 We used to engage in meaningful interactions and reply well even when Moxie didn't exist. While it's important to continue developing Moxie, I also believe that efforts should be made to address and improve the negative aspects that have emerged as a result of Moxie.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
4/7 2. Imbalance in Far Score The Far Score system creates significant disparities based on rank. While I acknowledge the achievements of high-rank users, the current system feels unfair.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
5/7 my thought: Allocate Far Score more broadly based on rank. It might be useful to reference the allocation graph from the previous season’s Degen Open Rankings. Limit the total amount of Moxie distributed each day, allocating it according to Far rankings.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
6/7 This would cap the total Moxie points an individual can give. I believe we should continue adjusting this figure over time to reach an optimal balance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dd8🎩🎭 pfp
dd8🎩🎭
@dd8
7/7 Shouldn't Moxie jail be limited based on the total score from replies, recasts, and likes, rather than just restricting replies? If the total amount is limited, there would be no need for a Moxie prison anymore.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BoriBori  pfp
BoriBori
@boribori.eth
I think we need to start with this article and have an appropriate discussion. I think the current system is problematic. This is a way of serving all of us. 100 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

πŸ’©zanaπŸ’© pfp
πŸ’©zanaπŸ’©
@zzana.eth
μž˜μ½κ³ κ°€μš©πŸ‘πŸ‘
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Amir Mabhout pfp
Amir Mabhout
@amirmabhout
Valid, i think once market comes around, we will see tricks to pump it up πŸš€
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ian πŸŽ©πŸŽ­πŸ’Ž pfp
Ian πŸŽ©πŸŽ­πŸ’Ž
@danial-jung.eth
Well, it's really hard. I think what you suggest is the direction we should go in the end. However, I don't think we can overlook new or returned users because of Moxie farming (?). In any case, the basis of everything, the farcaster, needs to be active to do other things. If farming is not allowed unlike now, most of them will probably leave again. Ha ha, what should we do? I think there's a way to keep the current system in place and set the limit per person as you said. We could raise the reward for Quote. Also, we could reward with monthly, not the Daily, like Degen right now We can't give a clear answer in a short time, but I think we need to think together about how we can do symbiosis. It's just my opinion~ I thought about it late at night :) Good night~ See you soon! 100 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

axek pfp
axek
@axek
It's feature not a bug
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction