Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
makemake
@makemake
Nuclear take: Account abstraction is fundamentally incompatible with how we are scaling ethereum and will be a meme until we all ossify on using a single rollup for everything
9 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
Agree. One of the things I love about EOAs is that they're the same across all EVM chains. Smart Contract based accounts break this. I'm not a fan. Deploying across all chains isn't a realistic solution. We need something better and more scalable.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
makemake
@makemake
We need a better address format that incorporates chainids amongst other things
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Strong agree on that second point. It is cool that Ethereum is infinitely general, but we need a way to subset. Most people want an account they can understand. “Arbitrary assets on arbitrary chains” is bad for that, and currently there is no way to restrict.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pierre Pauze 🔵 🚽
@pierrepauze
What does it mean ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Checking account contents: very easy to understand. $123 Robinhood contents: 1 AAPL, 2 GOOG, 3 TSLA. Still easy. Now open any active eth wallet. You have 0.0143000021 ETH, a bit more ETH with a tiny logo in the corner (Arbitrum), some Base USDC, and u just got 1 trillion unsolicited BULLPUMP on “zora”
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Easy to forget how alienating this is for the uninitiated
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
