Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Did @l2beat ever post an explanation of why Base is Stage 0 while Optimism is Stage 1? High level they look the same. it seems to hinge on "Security Council is not properly set up", but I can't immediately see out why not.
4 replies
24 recasts
98 reactions

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
The actual governance structure is a big graph of connected Gnosis SAFEs. The could-steal-funds master admin is a 2/2 SAFE whose members are (Optimism Foundation 5/7 SAFE, Base 3/6 SAFE).
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
IIRC Base didn't complete all the upgrades yet to become Stage 1? Or they just did (was scheduled for end of October?) and @l2beat hasn't updated yet? https://warpcast.com/cryptso.eth/0x7838f0f4
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
The base team explained it in this article: https://base.mirror.xyz/eOsedW4tm8MU5OhdGK107A9wsn-aU7MAb8f3edgX5Tk “Today, smart contract upgrades on Base are reviewed and approved by several contributors from the Base and Optimism teams. Getting to Stage 1 means expanding this set of approvers to a broader, decentralized group of stakeholders — a “security council” — ensuring that Base protocol upgrades are managed without centralized control.”
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jarrett pfp
Jarrett
@jarrettr
Have no idea what it actually means but I think I remember people talking about “fault proofs”? Could be wrong
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction