flows

about the unfair cancellation of the nounish TUCK AND UP meeting flow that canceled without any reason one of the meetings with the greatest real impact on public goods and active nouns 7 meetings with a flow of 60 to 40 people per meeting, incorporation of the community to the dhnouns dao platform and unity around nouns and sports, we had 2300 votes from the community in favor of the flow that was removed without verifying that the @flowit w agents did not make the indicated associations in time, The automation of these processes should be more manual, since we're not sure the automated agents will do their job correctly, associating the information with each specific flow. This underfunds an entire community.

Daniel Camilo Osorio Torres.
http://linktr.ee/dcot
Contemporary Graphics-ART-CYPTO- dcot.space
🧠 /lost-pixel-city 🐸 ₿ 
♾️⚡ fuzzyface.eth 🗂 dcot-deployer.eth

bringing the makers together 

/flows /vrbs

Okay, I'll resend the request in a few hours. I'll include some improvements to verify people's attendance, records of what nouns are spoken in each of the meetings, audio-visual records of the meetings. I'll also add a video of all the activity we have at each event on Instagram. And above all, I'll be more attentive to the specific flow page and its updates. And metrics, how is it possible to delete a flow with a score of 90? And I see other flows that have not been updated in more than 2 months and their score is 0 and are not deleted. Meetings with audiences of less than 10 people that are sold economically with the same resources as meetings that benefit more than 40 people and change the dynamics of a space, even a public place. Well, the idea is to build together and improve, but it's something I'm thinking about. Maybe they need to see conventional things like signed attendee lists and invoices.

hey you should reapply. issue stemmed from the fact that your updates were not showing on your grant page because they were associated with your athletes grant instead.