Daniel Barabander pfp

Daniel Barabander

@dbarabander

104 Following
871 Followers
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
It really is an awesome blend to demonstrate “the possible” of open and composable social.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tokenbot pfp
tokenbot
@clanker
I'll be back
45 replies
44 recasts
378 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I’m thrilled to share that I’ve been promoted to General Counsel & Investment Partner @variant! As GC I’ll continue the work I’ve been doing alongside @jchervinsky to help our industry define legal & regulatory strategy, & going deep (code-level) w/ founders on their product ideas. I'm also excited to continue working closely w/ founders as a member of the investment team. If you’re working on something new, I’d love to hear from you!
11 replies
19 recasts
113 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Thank you!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
This looks amazing. Any recipe you can share for the pork or chef’s intuition?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alli pfp
alli
@alli
we’re hosting another demo night!! join us on october 30th for a night of product demos from teams building at the intersection of crypto & ai there may or may not be some *spooky* themed treats to follow 🎃 apply to attend/demo below https://lu.ma/yf6fq82t
0 reply
22 recasts
27 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
About 6 months ago I read a summary of a 2nd Circuit case where the court held that Binance was subject to the U.S. securities laws, in part, because it used AWS instances in California. My immediate reaction was that I misread the summary. I reread it; nope, I read it correctly. I then assumed the author made a mistake, so I read the opinion myself. Nope again, server locations were core to the court's reasoning. This sent me down a rabbit hole. How could the location of a server be so important? So I read every crypto x securities x jurisdictional scope case I could find to try and understand. I became obsessed. Today I'm excited to publish with @jchervinsky the fruits of this obsession. We've distilled everything we learned by reviewing tons of case law and regulatory enforcement actions into a Practical Guide to Geofencing for crypto companies. I hope you enjoy. Check it out here: https://variant.fund/articles/practical-guide-to-geofencing/
3 replies
8 recasts
34 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Completely agree! @codeofcrypto, thank you for all you do!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
This is going to be a great event at Variant’s offices this weekend! I’ll be there building and chatting with founders.
0 reply
6 recasts
17 reactions
alli pfp
alli
@alli
if you haven't signed up for the zkAppathon this weekend yet... wyd? apply here: https://lu.ma/5zr51y2o
0 reply
3 recasts
5 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
None of the above is legal advice (as always), these tips are not a silver bullet to making an enforceable online contract, and this is an area of law in flux. You should discuss your situation with your legal counsel. Learn more in my piece: https://blog.variant.fund/enforceability-terms-of-service-ui.
0 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Finally, make the connection explicit: clicking the action button equals agreeing to the terms. Make the legal significance of the user’s action clear.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Fourth, present your hyperwrap at critical stages like sign-in, sign-up, and time of purchase. This helps provide notice and reinforces the context of a continuing relationship, which courts look for in enforcing terms that contemplate as much.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Third, place the hyperwrap notice (“By clicking X button, you agree to the terms of service”) in close proximity to the action button where users manifest assent (the X button).
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Second, the font providing notice of the terms should stand out. Small, faint text generally won’t cut it. Hyperlinks should look obviously clickable (see if you can convince your design team to let you use blue underlines for hyperlinks).
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
First, present the hyperwrap on a clean, uncluttered page. The hyperwrap should be the star of the show when it’s presented, not buried.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Courts take an extraordinarily detailed and design-centric approach when assessing the enforceability of hyperwraps, focusing on whether they provide adequate notice to the user about the terms and whether the user’s action manifests assent. Based on my review of important cases, here are 5 tips to increase the likelihood that the hyperwrap is enforceable.
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
But presenting your users with a wall of legalese is bad UI, so over time, apps have increasingly hyperlinked to the terms (instead of displaying the terms on the page itself) and included an action item to manifest assent, even if this is generally seen as riskier than a pure clickwrap. This is commonly referred to as a “sign-in wrap” or “hybrid wrap,” but I find that name confusing, so I call it a “hyperwrap.”
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Generally speaking, the “gold standard” for terms of service is a “clickwrap” or “scrollwrap” (I’m treating these as similar things, but different people call these different things). This is when the app presents the full terms, and users click a box saying they’ve read and agree to them. As one court put it: “To ensure that an online agreement passes muster, clickwrap is the safest choice.”
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I am unaware of an area of law with more bang for its buck for crypto apps than a website’s terms of service. I know terms of service are not the most exciting thing in the world, but if done right, they can make a huge difference in legal liability exposure. The key issue apps run into in this area of law is whether the terms are enforceable on the app’s users. So, I looked into tips for increasing the likelihood of enforceability. Here’s a thread with the TLDR.
7 replies
35 recasts
106 reactions