Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Michael Pfister
@pfista
I’ve always assumed having a portable social graph is a net positive and something I’d want At Threads scale it turns out people used the app more when they rebuilt a graph from scratch rather than importing from instagram The good news with Farcaster is that it’s always an option and up to each client to decide how to onboard users. And channels are a good way to creating new sub graphs aka cozy corners Raises questions around why people wouldn’t want to import their graph. The chameleon factor. People want isolated communities where they can express themselves differently depending on the audience My behavior already reveals this- I post slightly different things to different networks
8 replies
18 recasts
116 reactions
Bullers
@db
hmm that's interesting and understandable. Different personas for different communities
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Pfister
@pfista
think about linked in vs tiktok vs x very different posting and content norms, each with their own subcultures wonder how communities and cultures would change with a universal social graph
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Yep though it’s a good starter to fill the initial homefeed potentially vs pure blank Use farcaster network data to fill it but don’t overly suggest adding new follows What will be interesting is if that means different „link“ (follow) types on the protocol for different apps / content types or if that forces some to not be farcaster follows but only on that experience and whether or not content goes to FC or not Maybe we also fragment by app type? So you check the signer. Oh Warpcast? Nope we won’t show that on our Shortform Video app even though you follow that user But if it comes from another short form app hell yeah we show it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Bullers
@db
agree feed should be active and not blank
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
