Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Iโve always assumed having a portable social graph is a net positive and something Iโd want At Threads scale it turns out people used the app more when they rebuilt a graph from scratch rather than importing from instagram The good news with Farcaster is that itโs always an option and up to each client to decide how to onboard users. And channels are a good way to creating new sub graphs aka cozy corners Raises questions around why people wouldnโt want to import their graph. The chameleon factor. People want isolated communities where they can express themselves differently depending on the audience My behavior already reveals this- I post slightly different things to different networks
8 replies
2 recasts
34 reactions
Bullers
@db
hmm that's interesting and understandable. Different personas for different communities
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Pfister
@pfista
think about linked in vs tiktok vs x very different posting and content norms, each with their own subcultures wonder how communities and cultures would change with a universal social graph
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Bullers
@db
universal and consistent won't work, but personally owning your graph and customizing across platforms could. Let the people own the graph, not products themselves. I'd pull a few business connections from x to linkedin and warpcast but not all
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Pfister
@pfista
yep totally agree
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
